The case of the Menendez brothers, convicted of the brutal 1989 murder of their parents, continues to make headlines as California Governor Gavin Newsom announced parole board hearings for both Erik and Lyle Menendez. This move comes despite strong opposition from Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman, who is actively working to withdraw a previous motion that could have led to their re-sentencing.
Governor Newsom, speaking on his podcast This is Gavin Newsom, confirmed that the hearings are set for June 13, 2025. The decision to consider clemency has sparked a renewed debate over justice, rehabilitation, and the legal system’s handling of long-term incarceration cases. The governor emphasized that while Hochman has opposed re-sentencing, the parole hearings and independent clemency review will proceed as planned.
The Menendez Brothers: A Case That Shook America
The Menendez brothers, Lyle and Erik, were convicted of first-degree murder for the killings of their parents, José and Mary Louise “Kitty” Menendez, on August 20, 1989. They were sentenced to life in prison without parole in 1996 after a retrial found them guilty.
Their defense claimed that they suffered years of physical and sexual abuse at the hands of their parents, which led them to kill in self-defense. However, prosecutors argued that the murders were premeditated and motivated by greed, as the brothers stood to inherit a vast fortune. The case was one of the most sensationalized trials of the 1990s, attracting widespread media attention and public fascination.
Initially, the brothers denied involvement, claiming their parents were victims of a mafia hit. When they were eventually identified as the killers, they changed their story, stating that they feared for their lives due to ongoing abuse. Their first trial ended in a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury, but their second trial in 1996 resulted in convictions and life sentences.
Hochman’s Opposition and Motion to Withdraw Re-Sentencing
Los Angeles DA Nathan Hochman has taken a firm stance against the Menendez brothers’ efforts for re-sentencing and clemency. On March 10, 2025, Hochman filed an 88-page motion asking a judge to rescind the initial order for the re-sentencing hearing, arguing that the brothers have never shown true remorse for their actions.
Hochman claims that the Menendez brothers fabricated their abuse allegations, suborned perjury, and manipulated witnesses to support their claims. He highlighted that the brothers initially tried to mislead investigators by blaming the mafia, only later adopting the abuse narrative when faced with overwhelming evidence.
“As a full examination of the record reveals, the Menendez brothers have never come clean and admitted that they lied about their self-defense,” Hochman stated. “They have never fully acknowledged the truth behind their actions.”
Despite Hochman’s opposition, the re-sentencing hearings are still scheduled for March 20 and 21, 2025. These hearings were initially granted under former DA George Gascón, who had taken a more progressive approach to criminal justice reform, often advocating for reduced sentences and re-evaluations of past convictions.
Newsom’s Clemency Review and Parole Hearing Process
Governor Newsom’s decision to grant parole hearings for the Menendez brothers reflects his broader criminal justice policies, which emphasize rehabilitation and reconsideration of long-term sentences. He clarified that while Hochman’s opposition might influence public perception, it does not directly impact the independent clemency review process.
Following the parole board hearings on June 13, a detailed report will be submitted to Newsom’s office. This report will be considered alongside the results of the independent risk assessment, which evaluates whether the Menendez brothers pose a continued threat to society. Based on this review, Newsom will decide whether to grant clemency or commute their sentences.
The governor’s approach highlights a growing trend in criminal justice reform, where long-incarcerated individuals are given the opportunity for review based on changed circumstances, new evidence, or rehabilitation efforts.
Attorney Mark Geragos Fires Back
Attorney Mark Geragos, who represents the Menendez brothers, has strongly criticized Hochman’s actions. In a March 11 interview on NBC’s Today, Geragos accused Hochman of ignoring key evidence and re-traumatizing the brothers’ family members.
“This DA had made up his mind,” Geragos stated. “There were 22 family members who signed on, met with the DA’s office, and told them, ‘Stop re-traumatizing us.’ We could tell at that meeting that he had no interest in justice—only in maintaining the status quo.”
Geragos argued that Hochman’s decision was politically motivated, aimed at demonstrating a tough-on-crime stance rather than a fair consideration of the case’s complexities. He also criticized Hochman for failing to notify the victims’ family members before filing his motion to rescind the re-sentencing order.
“They’re not interested in the victims,” Geragos continued. “They didn’t even let the victims know they were making this decision. He is almost serially abusing them with his lies.”
Public Reaction and Future Implications
The Menendez brothers’ case remains one of the most polarizing criminal cases in modern U.S. history. While some believe they received a fair and just punishment for their crimes, others argue that their trial was tainted by media sensationalism and a lack of consideration for their alleged abuse.
The parole hearings and clemency review could set a precedent for future cases involving claims of childhood abuse and long-term incarceration. If the Menendez brothers are granted clemency or parole, it could signal a shift in how the justice system handles cases of family violence and the rehabilitation of long-term inmates.
Regardless of the outcome, the decision will have lasting ramifications not only for Erik and Lyle Menendez but also for the broader legal landscape concerning re-sentencing, clemency, and parole in high-profile murder cases.
Disclaimer – Our editorial team has thoroughly fact-checked this article to ensure its accuracy and eliminate any potential misinformation. We are dedicated to upholding the highest standards of integrity in our content.