CNS News– In a disturbing development from Tennessee, Paul Faye, a resident of Cunningham, has been apprehended by the FBI following a meticulous investigation that spanned nearly a year. The arrest, executed on a Monday, has brought to light Faye’s alleged plans to engage in acts of violence against federal border agents, fueled by his belief that the United States is “being invaded” by migrants.
The details of this case, first brought to public attention through Court Watch, an online publication, underscore the growing concern over domestic threats and the radicalization of individuals against federal entities. The case against Faye centers on his sale of an unregistered firearm suppressor, a charge that carries a significant weight of up to 10 years in prison upon conviction.
This charge, detailed in a criminal complaint filed by federal prosecutors in Nashville, is but the tip of the iceberg in what appears to be a more extensive plot involving armed conflict at the U.S. southern border. Faye’s connection to this broader plot is linked to his association with Bryan C. Perry, another Tennessee militia member with alleged plans for a violent confrontation with Border Patrol agents.
Perry, hailing from Clarksville, Tennessee, was apprehended in 2022, and charged with conspiring to kill federal agents. His arrest revealed a chilling intent to recruit militia members to shoot migrants and federal agents, an endeavor that came to a head when Perry reportedly fired at FBI agents in Missouri during his arrest in October 2022.
Tennessee militia member planned to attack US border agents, feds say https://t.co/b9oJTZa0Pv
— WLOX (@WLOX) February 7, 2024
The criminal complaint against Faye sheds light on his involvement with Perry and potentially other militia groups, though the specific organizations are not named. According to the complaint, Faye had planned to accompany Perry to the border before Perry’s arrest. This detail suggests a level of coordination and shared intent among individuals within these militia circles, raising concerns about the extent of such networks and their potential for violence.
According to the complaint, Faye boasted a considerable arsenal of weapons at his Tennessee residence and possessed Tannerite, a substance that can be converted into explosives. His discussions with the undercover agent, initiated in March 2023, unveiled a deep-seated mistrust of the U.S. government, which Faye accused of training against its citizens and facilitating migrant crossings to undermine the country.
In a particularly alarming conversation in May 2023, Faye expressed his belief that “patriots” would need to “rise” in response to the perceived invasion by migrants. He detailed plans to bring explosives to the border and act as a sniper, indicating a premeditated intent to engage in violent acts against migrants and federal agents.
The severity of Faye’s intentions became even more apparent during a meeting on January 11, where he showcased his collection of weapons, ammunition, and a bulletproof vest to the undercover agent. This meeting not only confirmed the extent of Faye’s preparations but also his willingness to discuss and plan acts of violence, specifically targeting the U.S./Mexico border.
Read More News: Texas Democrat’s Bold Move Derails Impeachment Vote, Jeffries Supports!
Claim: Texas Company Allegedly Used a False Biden Robocall that Told People Not to Vote!
Breaking: Biden’s Bold Move Against GOP’s Israel Aid Bill Shocks Washington!
The culmination of these interactions led to Faye’s sale of an unregistered firearms suppressor to the undercover agent, a transaction that ultimately facilitated his arrest. This suppressor, sold for $100, lacked a serial number, violating federal firearms regulations and providing tangible evidence of Faye’s illegal activities. The case against Paul Faye, while focused on the sale of an unregistered suppressor, unveils a deeper and more troubling narrative of radicalization and planned violence against federal entities and migrants.
As Faye awaits his detention hearing on February 12, the broader implications of this case resonate far beyond the courtroom, highlighting the ongoing challenges faced by law enforcement in identifying and neutralizing domestic threats. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the complex and evolving nature of domestic extremism, requiring vigilant and coordinated efforts to ensure public safety and uphold the rule of law.