The U.N. and The U.S. Disagree Over the Israel-Hamas Conflict! Here’s What They Disagree On!

By Pennie Spruill On Dec 9, 2023

The recent conflict between Israel and Hamas has not only heightened tensions in the Middle East but also caused significant diplomatic rifts internationally, particularly between the United Nations (U.N.) and the United States (U.S.). This article aims to provide an insightful analysis of the differing stances of these two influential entities, highlighting the complexities and implications of their disagreement.

The U.S. recently vetoed a U.N. resolution that called for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, a move that reflects a deeper disagreement between the two on how to approach the Israel-Hamas war. The resolution’s failure was met with criticism from the Palestinian envoy to the U.N., who warned that the continued Israeli offensive in Gaza would lead to more atrocities.

The U.N. itself is experiencing internal turmoil due to the conflict. With over 70 U.N. employees killed in Gaza, emotions are running high among U.N. staffers. The conflict has revived questions about the U.N.’s effectiveness in resolving such crises.

The U.S. stance, particularly its resistance to calls for a ceasefire, has been perceived as supportive of Israel’s actions, while the U.N. is divided, with some members calling for stronger action against Hamas and others advocating for a more balanced approach.

This disagreement reflects broader global tensions. Countries like Russia and China, both holding veto power in the U.N. Security Council, have opposed the U.S. perspective, further complicating the situation.

The U.N. General Assembly passed a non-binding resolution led by Jordan and other Arab states calling for a humanitarian truce, but the U.S. voted against it, partly due to its failure to specifically mention Hamas or the hostages involved. The voting patterns in the U.N. General Assembly displayed a significant divide, contrasting sharply with resolutions against Russia’s war in Ukraine, which received widespread support.

In conclusion, the U.N.-U.S. disagreement over the Israel-Hamas conflict underscores a complex web of diplomatic relations, ideological differences, and geopolitical strategies. It highlights the challenges in achieving consensus on international conflicts, especially when they are as deeply rooted and contentious as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Pennsylvania Lawmakers Urge Removal of Penn Board President Liz Magill!

Florida Democrats Want Governor De Santis to Stop His Campaign to Ban Books!