CNS News–Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has taken a significant step in the long-standing whistleblower lawsuit against him. In a surprising turn of events, Paxton announced his decision to no longer contest the facts of the case, indicating his readiness to accept any judgment passed.
This development follows a series of legal challenges that culminated in the Texas Supreme Court, an all-GOP bench, ruling against Paxton’s efforts to avoid depositions. Paxton’s move is portrayed as an effort to conclude what he describes as a “wasteful” and “distracting” lawsuit.
The case, initiated by his former top deputies, accuses Paxton of illegal termination in retaliation for reporting alleged abuses of office to law enforcement. Despite Paxton’s framing, the whistleblower’s attorney, Tom Nesbitt, interprets this as a delay tactic to avoid exposing the truth about Paxton’s alleged misconduct.
This lawsuit roots back to 2020 when four former top deputies accused Paxton of misusing his office to assist a friend and campaign donor, Nate Paul. The whistleblowers nearly reached a settlement with Paxton for $3.3 million, but the deal fell through due to legislative hesitancy over using taxpayer dollars.
Ken Paxton says he’ll accept judgment, won’t contest facts in whistleblower case https://t.co/GmEB4o24fT
— KSAT 12 (@ksatnews) January 19, 2024
Read More News: Sen. Ted Cruz and Two Democrats from Texas Are Tied in The Polls!
A Man in Florida Films Himself Accidently While Stealing a Security Camera!
Texas Court Orders Deposition of Meta Chief Mark Zuckerberg in Facial Recognition Lawsuit
Following the collapse of the settlement, the House initiated an investigation, leading to Paxton’s impeachment trial, where he was ultimately acquitted. Paxton’s recent court filing signifies a strategic withdrawal from his previous stance of denial regarding violations of the Texas Whistleblowers Act.
However, he emphasizes that this should not be seen as an admission of guilt. In contrast, whistleblower representatives maintain their commitment to uncovering the truth, insisting on Paxton’s accountability under oath. The lawsuit’s implications extend beyond the courtroom, encompassing federal investigations and a broader political narrative in Texas.
Paxton, meanwhile, shifts focus to other high-profile issues his office is handling, such as immigration and lawsuits against major corporations like Pfizer and Google. The whistleblowers, steadfast in their pursuit of justice, are determined to have their day in court, seeking more than just monetary compensation but a reckoning with the truth.
